
| Bosses | Homepage
Gadget Lets Boss Spy on You From Afar
A company named HeadThere Inc. has announced a new communication tool called the Giraffe Video Conferencing Robot.
Using the Giraffe, a distant team member can interact and socialize with peers at their company's headquarters without ever stepping on a plane. An engineer can see and speak with anyone on the factory floor, even from a different country. These capabilities decrease travel expenses while fostering collaboration.
The Giraffe is a mobile robot that can be moved around its location by remote control using the Internet. The Giraffe allows a user to hear, see, and speak at a far away location, just like traditional video conferencing. This fusion of robotics and video conferencing allows a user to feel like they are at the robot's location. Because people near the robot can see and hear the user, they interact with him as if he were truly present. In a sense, the robot acts as a stand-in for the user.
It sounds like an interesting device until you read this post from CNET's Crave about how it could be used by a suspicious boss to spy on you at your cubicle or in the break room.
HeadThere even has some text on its website about how bosses can use it.
Do you manage teams at multiple geographic locations? Now you can "manage-by-walking-around" even if you're not there. Keep teams focused on their goals and build camaraderie using impromptu water-cooler talks and casual chats, just like if you were there. If you manage a factory floor or lab space, you can inspect progress from afar without relying on periodic status meetings.
See how it says bosses can "inspect progress from afar." How long until a gadget like the Giraffe Video Conferencing Robot is required for telecommuting workers? Hopefully never. Telecommuting would not be much fun if you boss was at home with you. The good news is that if your manager or boss practices Giraffequette then none of this should be a problem.
Posted on April 8, 2007
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |
| |
Do Great CEOs Have to Be Jerks?
An article on Business2.0 is defending bosses from hell. They use Apple's CEO Steve Jobs as an example.
Most books about leadership read like the Scout manual: CEOs and top managers should be authentic, considerate, sensitive, and modest, as well as creative, smart, and strategically brilliant. All true - but not very useful in the real world, where the person in the corner office might be as approachable as the junkyard dog.
Exhibit A: Steve Jobs.
Is he the charming, jeans-wearing CEO whose dramatic unveiling of the Apple (Charts) iPhone in January drove the stock up 8 percent by day's end? Or is he, as has been chronicled in several books, the classic jerk boss, notorious for belittling subordinates and business partners?
He's both, of course, and not much different from most executives: blessed with some attributes and cursed with others.
Everyone has flaws and that goes from both executives and employees. Steve Jobs appears to be much more under control today than he was as a CEO of the younger Apple during the Apple-Microsoft battles during the 80s. Not all bosses can get away with this kind of behavior. The article calls Michael Eisner an egomaniacal boss and he ended up resigning from Disney. Even Steve Jobs lost his CEO position during his younger days as Apple's CEO.
Posted on March 5, 2007
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |
| |
Study: Why Bosses are Hated by Employees
A new study by FSU professor Wayne Hochwarter, an associate professor of management in FSU's College of Business, and his two doctoral students reveals a few of the reasons why people hate their bosses.
Working with doctoral students Paul Harvey and Jason Stoner, Hochwarter surveyed more than 700 people who work in a variety of jobs about their opinions of supervisor treatment on the job. The survey generated the following results:
Thirty-one percent of respondents reported that their supervisor gave them the "silent treatment" in the past year.
Thirty-seven percent reported that their supervisor failed to give credit when due.
Thirty-nine percent noted that their supervisor failed to keep promises.
Twenty-seven percent noted that their supervisor made negative comments about them to other employees or managers.
Twenty-four percent reported that their supervisor invaded their privacy.
Twenty-three percent indicated that their supervisor blames others to cover up mistakes or to minimize embarrassment.
According to the researchers, "Employees stuck in an abusive relationship experienced more exhaustion, job tension, nervousness, depressed mood and mistrust. They also were less likely to take on additional tasks, such as working longer or on weekends, and were generally less satisfied with their job. Also, employees were more likely to leave if involved in an abusive relationship than if dissatisfied with pay."
It looks like quite a few people feel their bosses were picking on them, ignoring them or using them. The study didn't say how many employees were not annoyed at all by their supervisors. It would be interesting to know how much overlap there was between the different grievances. (via Boing Boing)
Posted on January 4, 2007
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |
| |
Gen Y Confusing Workplace With Geekspeak and Chatty IMs
MSNBC.com has an article that should be of great interest to today's text-messaging youth. The article says that some employers are concerned by the fact that young new employees never come and talk to them.
Nor should they. Those skills are big assets when it comes to multi-tasking and productivity. But they're also a nightmare for many of their bosses, those over 35 who understand that while technology is a useful tool, it doesn't replace relationship building as a primary means for doing business. Today's bosses can't understand why their young recruits, for all their brains and technical acumen, hardly ever come over and actually talk to them.
"I hear from clients that [young professionals'] first instinct is to IM rather than walk over to their boss's office. That can be OK for a quick question, but when you're planning something, you need to talk face-to-face," says Steven Rothberg, founder of Collegerecruiter.com, who places recent graduates into corporate jobs.
The tech disparity between 20-somethings and 40-somethings is far greater today than it was 20 years ago, when today's 40-somethings were the young turks. Over 17 percent of today's workforce is between the ages of 25 and 34, while another 28 percent is made up of employees 55 and over, Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show.
That breakdown is not much different than in many past years. But what is different is the speed of technological progress since the mid-1990s, from the Internet and e-mail to cell phones and instant messaging. A recent survey by outplacement firm Lee Hecht Harrison shows that 60 percent of U.S. corporations acknowledge having workplace tensions among generations.
The generational gap is real. Many adults have not immersed themselves in the latest Web 2.0 technology. Many of them only recently became comfortable with email.
Ruth Sherman, a Greenwich, Connecticut-based communications consultant whose client roster includes Deloitte, Pfizer and Bank of America, says common complaints about younger workers range from lame handshakes and poor conversational skills to super-casual attire and personal use of company e-mail. Some show up at job interviews in tee shirts. What the Gen Yers don't see, she says, is the meaning and value of gestures and other non-verbal skills that don't come through in a text message.
"My clients are frustrated; a lot of them are throwing up their hands because they can't persuade young people to get it," Sherman says.
Carl Tyler, a veteran of Lotus and IBM who now runs Instant Technologies, an enterprise IM software group, thinks one of the biggest etiquette breaches by Gen Y recruits involves newbies typing paragraph upon paragraph of chat.
"It's a new medium, don't treat it like e-mail," Tyler says.”
If you are the new Gen Y recruit try and put yourself in the shoes of your elders. Go visit the boss for something important occasionally instead of sending him an IM full of geekspeak he won't understand.
Posted on September 5, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |
| |
Website Lets Workers Complain About Bosses
Boss Bitching calls itself a user driven social content website that allows anonymous postings of stories about bosses. There are already a lot of posts on the website about bosses covering everything from getting fired on fridays to lying bosses. The site also allows users to vote on each entry for whether they think this is story about a truly bad boss or a story about a worker that is simply complaining too much. There seem to be a lot of websites focused on this theme of complaining about your boss. Simply Fired and My Bad Boss are a couple more websites with a similar theme. The Boomer Chronicles lists a few more bad boss links. If you really must post to this kind of website be careful. Make sure there is no way you could end up being indentified either through your post or through a privacy breach on the website. (via Wall Street Folly)
Posted on August 15, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |
| |
My Bad Boss Contest
A new contest called My Bad Boss Contest is looking for stories about bad bosses. The contest has already selected two semifinalists including a dentist that stole from employees.
A bad boss can drive you nuts! Long hours, low pay. Hard work, no health insurance. The boss gets a golden parachute, you get no pension, no respect. You need a break.
If you don't want to enter another option is to read through the thousands of entries on the site for fun. Those entering should be careful to avoid being found out -- especially if you are discussing your current boss. Fortunately, one of the rules helps avoid this issue.
Do not include the name of the company or any personal names or other personal identifiers with the story. For legal reasons, stories including this information will not be posted.
The contest will pick a new semifinalist each week until a final voting period begins on Wednesday, July 26. The prizes include a week-long condo vacation. (via Tech Space)
Posted on July 10, 2006
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |
| |
Fictional Bosses You Wouldn't Want to Work For
For some comic relief Fast Company has a slideshow of nine fictional bosses you should be glad you don't work for.
Gordon Gekko -- Wall Street
C. Montgomery Burns -- The Simpsons
Tony Soprano --- The Sopranos
Ebenezer Scrooge -- A Christmas Carol
Darth Vader -- Star Wars
David Brent -- The Office
Dr. Evil -- Austin Powers
Cosmo S. Spacley -- The Jetsons
J. Peterman -- Seinfeld
These would be tough characters to work for. Except maybe Peterman. There is probably a worse fictional boss out there than him. How about the two bosses in Trading Places -- they wouldn't be much fun to work for. Or what about the bosses from The Firm?
Posted on December 9, 2005
Permalink | | | Comments (View) |
| |
| The Writers Write Lifestyle Network
|
|